I didn't get much from it, I thought it was rubbish and obvious. I'm not really sure why, it just seemed kind of obvious. the best bit was when she was having a counseling session with herself and a letter because the guy couldn't be there so it's just her saying and sir what do you think to a piece of paper. Otherwise I understand that their are lots of discourses associated with different jobs and everybody thinks differently and organizes their jobs differently to how they work. I guess it is nice to see how they think and approach things differently but if u were given this letter and 150 professions you could kind of guess what they would do with it. I suppose she had her input into how it was executed on being shown which was nice, I dont know though. I dont know why I didnt like it, it felt really obvious and I go on about art being too elitist but I dont know what Im trying to say. Everyone else is saying it's amazing. Maybe its because they got it. I like mystery when I see things, I like not to get it. I think it's because Im at such an early stage that I kind of dont get alot of it because I dont know all the references etc and my concept base isnt big enough. But I think I love exhibitions the most where I dont understand most of it and just get snippets which let me in. Before I used to not understand any of it, and slowly my profiles getting bigger and bigger and the subjective dialogue is becoming more advanced and complex.....I just felt like Calles exhibtion didnt really leave much for yourself. Yes I feel pain when Im or have dumpd someone.....but I wouldnt really see that approach to it as work. urgh. Maybe its because it was a saturday and loads of people?
It doesnt really show what its like to be human for her. I duno. I havent got enough time to waste typing about it. Average show.
No comments:
Post a Comment