Sol LeWitt - "Conceptual art is made to engage the mind of the viewer rather than his eye or emotions."
Marcel Duchamp - 'The Richard Mutt case''Society of Independent artists in New York 'Fountain'
'They say any artist paying six dollars may exhibit. Mr Richard Mutt sent in a fountain. Without discussion this article disappeared ad never was exhibited. Wat were the grounds for refusing Mr Mutt's fountain.
1. Some contended it was immoral, vulgar.
2.Others, it was plagiarism, a plain piece of [plumbing.
Whether Mr.Mutt with his own hands had made the fountain or not has no importance. He CHOSE it. He took an ordinary article f life, placed it so that its useful significance disappeared under the new titles and point of view - created a new thought for that object.
Sol LeWitt - 10. Ideas alone can be works of art. They are in a chain of development that evetually find some form. All ideas need not be made physical.
Sol LeWitt - Conceptual art is only good when the idea is good. Space can thought of as the cubic area occupied by a three-dimensional volume. Any volume would occupy space. It is air and cannot be seen. It is the interval between things that can be measured. When an artist uses a conceptual form of art, it means that all of the planning and decisions are made beforehand and the execution is a perfinctory affair. The idea becomes a machine that makes the art.
Al Reidheit? - The one thing to say about art and life is that art is art and life is life, that art is not life and that life is not art. A 'slice of life' art is no netter or no worse than a 'slice of art' life. Fine art is not a 'means of making a living' or 'a way of living a life' and an artist who dedicates his or her life to his art or his art to his life burdens his art with his life and his life with his art.?? - For the mainstream of modern art, we can postulate a theory that emphasizes the material character of art, a theory according to which a work of art is importantly or significantly, and not just peripherally, a physical object.
Joseph Kosuth - When objcts are presented within the context of art (and untill recently objects always have been used) they are eligable for aesthetic consideration as are any objects in the world, and an aesthetic consideration of an object exisiting in the realm of art means that the objects existance or functioning in an art context is irrelevant to the aesthetic judgement.
Aesthetic conciderations are indeed always extraneous to an objects function or 'reason to be' unless of course, that objects 'reason to be' is strictly aesthetic.
An example of a purely aesthetic object is a decorative object, for decorations primary funcation is 'to add something to, so as to make more attractive, adorn, orament and this relates directly to taste. (jeff koons)
??- a work of art should induce a sensation of mathematical order, and the means of inducing this mathematical order, and the means of inducing this mathmatical order should be sought amoung universal means.
LOVE ELEMENTS OF IT BUT NOT ALL.
USING FOUND IMAGES, NOT INTERESTED IN MAKING A PICTURE OF A GUN, MORE INTERESTED IN THE GUN ITSELF. USE FOUND IMAGERY BECAUSE THEY ALREADY EXIST AND ITS A DIFFERENT BALL GAME TRYING TO MAKE THE PHOTO. THIS IS HOW I WORK.
INTEREST IN THE SKY. I COLLECT SKY.
THE WAY THESE WERE EXHIBITED IN A MASSIVE LINE ALONG WALL. NICE
WHY ARE THESE IMAGES TOGETHER? FILL IN THE GAPS WITH UR HEAD TRIGGERING SUBJECTIVE CONVERSATIONS. LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
